Author Archives: johnrubens

Bill Clinton: [Speculative Fiction]: I meant until the time he actually incorporated the University.  Who knows what educating he’s done since then…well, I guess on twitter. https://johnrubens.wordpress.com/2016/08/23/billclinton-speculative-fiction-a-least-he-donaldjtrump-set-out-to-educate-its-obvious-in-every-aspect-of-his-life-hes-been-an-educator

#Guiliani: “[In New York we have our way of doing things–we just take away their guns.]” #Candidate: “Those pesky 2nd Amendment people, they’re so unpredictable.” https://johnrubens.wordpress.com/2016/08/22/those-pesky-2ndamendment-people Speculative Fiction Entry

Hello John, The Feericks are certainly a branch of the  de Bermingham family who were aristocrats both in Ireland and England. The de Berminghams in Irish circles were called the Gaelic version of Son of Piers. Piers was one of … Continue reading →

https://johnrubens.wordpress.com/2016/09/17/donald-trump

Hustle Chef Hamilton, pbs.org, Public Television, Anthony Bourdain et al. show on chefs & startup restaurants. pbs.org https://johnrubens.wordpress.com/2016/09/17/unwelcome-advances-well-excu-u-u-uzame-stevemartin-pbs-org

https://johnrubens.wordpress.com/2016/09/17/velocity-as-in-money-bankruptcydefense https://johnrubens.wordpress.com/2016/09/17/do-i-need-followers-or-employment

@UNFCCC I make mistakes. Do people that make mistakes lose followers? Do followers matter to everybody? https://johnrubens.wordpress.com/2016/09/17/velocity-as-in-money-bankruptcydefense  

#FeeltheBern #Switzerland            Dear @tedcruz: Although you brought up stark concerns re: #ICANN & #NTIA development, communications & information, privatization attractive a la #Calpine. https://johnrubens.wordpress.com/2016/09/17/un-tedcruz-icann-fcc-ferc-ntia  

https://johnrubens.wordpress.com/2016/09/17/two-paths-forward-un-or-multigovernment-agency-v-private-consensus-in-internet-filtering-cspan-lawrencestrickling-ntia-director-icann-los-angeles-ca-cspan-breaucratically-or-privately-manag

Condensed, edited Review of Review by Nicolas van de Walle: [H]is book illustrates the enduring influence of the colonial era: its primary subject is Anglophone Africa, and the material on Francophone and Lusophone Africa is rather perfunctory, reflecting the fact … Continue reading →